Home / Hex Ed. / Hexagonal beam vs Dipole

Hexagonal beam vs Dipole

How does the hexagonal beam compare with a dipole?

The dipole is actually a pretty good antenna. You can build one with very little expertise and only a few dollars, using trees as masts. They perform well in many cases and for the low frequency bands such as 80, 40 and 30 meters, they are not competing with directional antennas so everybody can be on a level playing field. Get an amplifier and become the big signal on your 75 meter net.

How about for DX and the bands above 30 meters? Well, the dipole still is a good performer and is even easier to install because it doesn’t take a large lot to put one up. Screen Shot 2014-06-27 at 5.20.08 PMPlus, you can get a respectable takeoff angle for good skip with a dipole at only 40 feet or so. When stations are broadside to the dipole, the dipole performs only slightly less than a hexagonal beam. The hexagonal beam has gain of about 3 dB over a dipole when the target is broadside to the dipole as shown on the azimuthal radiation pattern chart to the right. The Blue trace is the dipole pattern and the red trace is the hex. So if a DX station (shown North in this example) is broadside to the dipole, the dipole station is going to break the pileup about as well as the hex. So the dipole really does a decent job in some directions.

But what about a station that is off the end of the dipole (east in this example)? Well, this is a different story altogether and shows the big advantage of a hex. The hex just turns east toward the DX target and you can see the difference on the chart below. Now the dipole has a 10 dB disadvantage or about 1/10 of the signal that the hex has. This is the most obvious advantage of a directional antenna. But that’s not all.

The dipole station while sending a signal only 1/10 of the hex signal, is receiving signals from stations north and south that it really has no interest in. This is QRM big time. So the dipole station has trouble Screen Shot 2014-06-27 at 4.51.43 PMhearing the DX station because the DX signal is down 10 dB compared to how the hex station is hearing it and on top of that the dipole station is getting all that QRM from unwanted stations. Notice that the hex is not getting this unwanted QRM because the hex suppresses reception from unwanted directions.

These two factors, directionality and back/side signal suppression are what make the hex a huge winner over a dipole in most instances. Again when broadside, the dipole does a respectable job but because it can’t be rotated, more times than not it has a big handicap in snagging the DX. This limitation of the dipole is generally the case for any fixed wire antennas such as G5RV’s, doublets, windoms or whatever.

About Leo Shoemaker

Check Also

History of the Hexbeam

The original HEXBEAM was developed by Mike Traffic, N1HXA, in the early nineties. It is …

Translate »